Fair Value Measurement — ASC 820 vs IFRS 13
ASC 820 (US GAAP) and IFRS 13 (IFRS) are essentially converged — a single framework for how to measure fair value wherever another standard requires it. The differences are minor.
The framework (shared)
Section titled “The framework (shared)”- Fair value = exit price — the price to sell an asset / transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
- Three-level input hierarchy — Level 1 (quoted prices in active markets), Level 2 (other observable inputs), Level 3 (unobservable inputs).
- Highest and best use for non-financial assets; the principal (or most advantageous) market.
US GAAP vs IFRS 13 — the (minor) differences
Section titled “US GAAP vs IFRS 13 — the (minor) differences”| Area | US GAAP (ASC 820) | IFRS (IFRS 13) |
|---|---|---|
| Framework | Exit price, hierarchy, HBU | Same |
| NAV practical expedient | Available for certain investments | Not an identical expedient |
| Disclosures | Minor differences in detail | Minor differences in detail |
Key judgment areas
Section titled “Key judgment areas”- Level classification — observable vs unobservable inputs; transfers between levels.
- Valuation technique — market, income, or cost approach.
- Principal market and market-participant assumptions.
Related
Section titled “Related”- SAP implementation: fair value postings / valuation in SAP TRM and consolidation — write-up forthcoming under SAP & Enterprise Systems.
Limitations
Section titled “Limitations”An educational reference and original synthesis — not investment advice, and not a substitute for the standard or for professional accounting guidance. For authoritative measurement detail, consult ASC 820 / IFRS 13 directly.
Chat with Sajiv