GitHub

Inventory — ASC 330 vs IAS 2

Both ASC 330 (US GAAP) and IAS 2 (IFRS) measure inventory at the lower of cost and a recoverable ceiling, but they diverge on the permitted cost-flow assumptions and on whether write-downs can be reversed — differences that flow straight into a multinational’s parallel valuations.

  • Cost includes purchase cost, conversion cost, and the costs of bringing inventory to its present location and condition.
  • Cost-flow assumption — FIFO and weighted-average are permitted under both; LIFO is permitted under US GAAP only.
  • Measurement ceiling — written down when the carrying amount is not recoverable.

US GAAP vs IAS 2 — the differences that matter

Section titled “US GAAP vs IAS 2 — the differences that matter”
AreaUS GAAP (ASC 330)IAS 2
LIFOPermitted (with a LIFO reserve)Prohibited
Measurement ceilingLower of cost or market (LIFO/retail); LCNRV otherwiseLower of cost or net realizable value (LCNRV)
Write-down reversalProhibitedRequired when NRV recovers (up to original cost)

LIFO and the no-reversal rule are the big comparability items — they affect cost of sales, tax (LIFO reserve), and the recovery accounting an IFRS ledger must make that a US ledger cannot.

  • NRV estimation — selling price less costs to complete and sell.
  • Cost capitalization — which overheads and what normal-capacity absorption.
  • Write-down triggers and reversal (IFRS) — evidence that NRV has recovered.
  • SAP implementation: SAP Material Ledger / actual costing. Note: IFRS write-down reversals need a process a US-GAAP ledger forbids — a key parallel-ledger divergence.

An educational reference and original synthesis — not investment advice, and not a substitute for the standard or for professional accounting guidance. For authoritative measurement detail, consult ASC 330 / IAS 2 directly.